Jul 18 2008

Post 2 Post: Jack’s Notebook by Gregg Fraley (part of the Simmering Judgments Series)

I’m kind of a quirky guy. I don’t like reading fiction. Now, as a “Right-Brainer” you’d expect me to really dig fiction. But for the longest time, my Barnes & Noble receipts have been filled with non-fiction. Most of the time, my reading list looks like some research junkie’s to-do list.

So, when I was chosen to join this week’s Post 2 Post Book Tour for Gregg Fraley’s novel, “Jack’s Notebook,” I jumped at the chance. I was craving something “out of the norm.” And “Jack’s Notebook” is definitely not “IN the norm” for a CPS process book. “Jack’s Notebook” isn’t a DIY book. It’s not a traditional academic book. It’s not anything I’d ever have chosen to read (on my own). But on the cover I read “A Business Novel About Creative Problem Solving” so I was in. And after the first three pages, I realized that Jack, the main character, was generally me about five years ago… BOOM! I was hooked.

Personal similarities aside, Gregg Fraley builds a great story about Jack and Molly - two lost souls looking to improve their lot in life, but seeming to miss “The Big Picture.” Enter Manny - a sage, motivational guide that, after a chance meeting, pulls Jack through the six stages of creative problem solving techniques - all documented in Jack’s notebook.

Through an intriguing plot of romance, risk, difficulties, and not-so-perfect second chances, Fraley mixes his masterful teaching of the creative problem solving (CPS) process. From a truly unique perspective, Fraley gives us a novel outlining a complex process while proving that such processes can be learned and remembered through good, intriguing plot and narrative. And not only does he show that the CPS process is effective and easy to understand in business applications, but just as easily applied to any level of personal challenges - from basic to life-altering.

From page one, we’re allowed, without rote academia and monologues, to follow Manny, Jack, and Molly through the steps of the CPS process to an exciting and rewarding (albeit creative) conclusion. And as a bonus for us “just show me the map” readers, the process and notes are masterfully summarized at the end of the book. But don’t skip forward! The story is what gets you there.

I recently had the honor to ask Gregg some questions concerning his process and decisions while writing “Jack’s Notebook.”

Brand Chef(BC): What was your decision to create a novel based on the CPS process over a more traditional academic / case-study approach?

Gregg Fraley(GF): I decided to write a novel to teach CPS because I felt it was more involving and engaging than the typical business book or academic/case-study book. I have been impressed by the work of both Eli Goldratt, who wrote The Goal, and Patrick Lencioni who have pioneered the idea of business fiction. There books had me learning and I thought it was the ideal vehicle for CPS.

Also, there are some people who never buy dry business books. I was trying to reach people with this book who need the concepts of creative thinking who would not buy a business book but might buy a good story.

BC: How much of the novel is based on yourself or real situations / characters you’ve worked with? Do you have any examples you could site?

GF: It is not autobiographical exactly but it does draw on many experiences I’ve had in my life. For instance, I was once a budding photographer, and, I had many lousy jobs! In a sense I am both the main character Jack and the mentor character Manny, the professional problem solver. I’ve played both roles in real life. On the other hand I’ve never been involved in a kidnapping, never rode a horse, never broken into a ranch estate, and never staged explosive diversions. Clearly, this is a work of fiction!

BC: Have you found that, with advancements in technology (e.g. - online documentation, project development software, etc.) the note-taking stages for CPS have changed?

GF: How one does CPS has indeed changed over the years. Believe it or not, Post-its were at one point a major advancement! Having said that, realize that CPS is a problem solving “model”. It’s not prescriptive in terms of the tools you use to implement it. So, any stage could be done with paper and pencil, or, with an advanced software tool. I’ve done complete CPS cycles in the virtual world using tools like WebIQ.net, but it could be done with simpler tools, like email. I think the kind of “ideation” one does virtually versus the kind you might do in person is different — and they are both valuable and good. The ideal situation is to use both over a time period that allows incubation. For instance you could assign tasks to innovation teams members via email, get them started, and then collect their responses in preparation for an on-site intensive to complete a problem solving session. Why not use the best of both worlds?

BC: How, from a business mindset vs. a creative mindset (left brain vs. right brain) do you treat the CPS process differently? Do you find one group more capable or does it create more of a challenge for either?

GF: The thing is I don’t see a difference between a business mindset and a creative mindset. Business people have to be creative everyday, they face huge challenges, and the best business people have a creative mindset.

Creativity is more than self-expression, it is that, but it’s also problem solving and decision making. Business people are very in touch with problem solving and decision making, and stereotypically less so with self-expression.

There is a common myth that goes something like this: there are creative people and non-creative people. Creative people are artistic and right brained. By contrast business people are left brained and uncreative. In reality this is a myth that defines creativity too narrowly. Every human being has creative potential and it is their choice to use it and develop it or not.

To answer your question more directly, business people tend to take to a structured process like CPS because it gives them a way to use their creativity, it’s a “how to.” Creative artists, who are more familiar with creative process, sometimes find it too confining. There usual process is more organic and less structured. Some traditional creatives find CPS is helpful because it gives them something to fall back on to restart their organic creative process. I also find that traditional creatives can be very good at parts of CPS. For instance, improv actors are very good at the ideation phase of CPS – it’s what they’ve trained themselves to do.

BC: Do you have plans to take the novel and its characters further into new creative decision-making challenges and situations?

GF: I do, there is a sequel in the works.

BC: Ultimately, what did / do you hope to accomplish with this novel?

GF: I had hoped that I might reach a whole new group of people and empower them with a “technology” that has been a corporate secret for over 50 years. I think I’ve done that, and, it keeps getting better. My hope is that it continues to build and like Julia Cameron’s The Artist Way, it eventually becomes a best seller.

What’s happening with this book is it’s slowly being recognized as a deceptively effective way to engage people on the subject of creative thinking. I’ve had readers send me notes saying that they’d read all sorts of books on creativity and innovation and mine is the first one that has them actually doing something different. One man sent me a note and said two weeks after reading it he’s quit his job and started his own business, and he said it was a direct result of writing down ideas everyday in a notebook. A woman wrote me a few days ago and said she had a whole new relationship with the idea of problem framing, and that it was leading her to breakthrough’s in several areas of her life. A man in Massachustes who heads up a non profit to prevent teenage suicide has made the book a requirement for new staff, as he feels it provides them with a great tool for the challenges they face, and a common language to dialog those challenges. Several corporations are buying multiple copies of the book and making it required reading. Those are usually in innovation departments, but also I’ve seen bulk orders from design firms, and high schools.

******

With that, I highly recommend “Jack’s Notebook” by Gregg Fraley. It’s a beautiful departure from statistics and case studies! And for those of you “stuck” in a challenge, this book shows you that there’s a light at the end of the tunnel… or should I say a brighter page at the end of the notebook?

Thank you Gregg for your time and the wonderful book! I look forward to the sequel.

And thank you Paul Williams, over at Idea Sandbox, for inviting The Brand Chef onto the tour!

Order your copy of “Jack’s Notebook” today.


Jack’s Notebook

A Business Novel About Creative Problem Solving
By: Gregg Fraley

Published: Feb 13, 2007
ISBN: 9780785221661
Format: Hardcover, 242pp
Publisher: Thomas Nelson Inc

Keep Cooking!
Andrew


Jul 17 2008

Water, Water Everywhere…


In a post in this morning’s Freakonomics section of the New York Times, authors Stephen Dunber and Steven Levitt pose the question, “Is Water Too Cheap?” Their post, based on economist David Zetland’s argument on California’s water problem, outlines a restructuring of water pricing that would “punish water guzzlers and encourage conservation.”

In Zetland’s argument, he states that by restructuring the water pricing (dramatically raising costs from approximately $2.80 - $3.40/gal. or $35/mo. to $5.60/gal. or $95/mo. - a 217% increase) for Californians, the market will correct itself.


(chart credit: Forbes.com & Los Angeles Department of Water and Power)

Okay, I see that. Instead of simply breaking even on water costs and creating an unmanageable water deficit; make municipal water a profit center and discourage users from over use.

But as Dunber and Levitt so aptly ask, “…would higher prices at the tap be as influential … as higher prices at the pump,” creating a tipping point for water usage, just as they predict will happen for gas.

Assessment: I think market manipulation like Zetland’s suggestion will just lead us down a detrimentally slippery slope. And that slope is covered with water and crude oil.

Let’s look at it this way.

According to the US Census Bureau, California’s population is hovering right around 36.5 million (just over 10% of the total US population) with a projected growth rate 7.6% annually. That works out to 12 million households consuming water and about 13 million in ‘09. If we’re to pump the costs of water up by over 200% for 12 million households what do you think will result?

More bottled water.

Sure, bottled water currently costs more than tap, but after a tap cost hike like the one Zetland is proposing; where will consumers turn for hydration on those hot California days? Pools, baths, dishes, cars and lawns aside; demand for ingested water would become such a commodity that bottle manufacturers - those non-biodegradable, crude oil thieves - would be swimming in a pool of Middle Eastern Saudi swill and ozone destruction.

Higher tap costs = higher bottled water consumption = higher crude oil consumption + additional non-recyclable waste = aforementioned slippery slope.

But that’s just my opinion.

Of course there are efforts to move plastics to a “more green” production process, but how soon will that happen?

I’d love to get your spin on this. Do you think 10% of the U.S. population can be made to pay more for water - forcing them to look for other resources for consumable water? What kind of effect will that have on our National economy? Will it measurably affect the already skyrocketing crude oil costs? And globally, will it have an effect on the environment?

Let’s get this conversation boiling.

Until tomorrow,
Keep Cooking!
Andrew


Jul 16 2008

My Personal Brand Is Kinda’ Funny… I Think.


I’ve always been a huge fan of stand up comedians. For a short time, at the end of high school, I even entertained the idea of becoming a comedian. I dabbled in comedy ventures ranging from short stories to political cartoons and satire. I even spent a short while as M.C. in a karaoke bar (that’s funny just to say).

But as I transitioned into early adulthood, I realized that, although I thought I was funny, most others really didn’t “get me.” (virtually every artist feels this) So, short lived, that dream faded away along with flowing capes, top hats, fire trucks, and tap shoes (yes, tap shoes).

I’m not sure if it’s my impending 40th birthday or simply retrospective wanderlust, but lately I’ve been looking up old routines by some of my favorite comedians. Now, my taste in comedy ranges from the silly (Steve Martin, Jerry Lewis) to the risqué (Eddie Murphy, George Carlin); but, hands down, my favorite and most dear idol has to be Bill Cosby.

Bill Cosby, for all of his commercial success, to this day is a brilliant man. His insight on human nature and the ability to spin a story brought the art of comedy to new heights and awareness of diversity to the forefront at a time in American history that was struggling with race and cultural stress (Time Magazine Article). Cosby stepped up and showed us, through comedy, that we’re all not that different. We’re all human. We’re all prone to make mistakes. And we’re all God’s children, so it’s really okay.

I’ve never seen Bill Cosby use a prop. I’ve never seen him resort to “blue humor.” He’s a brilliant, comedic educator. And that’s what has appealed to me since I first saw him on PBS’s “Electric Company” - I was just a wee-one, then. Cosby just made me think funny thoughts. Hell, Cosby just made me think… And that’s what has become part of me… My Personal Brand.

Thank you Steve Woodruff for asking if Personal Brands really mattered. Without that kick start, this post would have never happened. And thank you Bill Cosby (not to mention Steve, Jerry, Eddie, and George) for forming part of my Personal Brand.

Here are some of my favorite Cosby Quotes:

I don’t know the key to success, but the key to failure is trying to please everybody.”

Human beings are the only creatures on earth that allow their children to come back home.”

I am proud to be an American. Because an American can eat anything on the face of this earth as long as he has two pieces of bread.”

Advertising is the most fun you can have with your clothes on.”

“Every closed eye is not sleeping, and every open eye is not seeing.

“Fatherhood is pretending the present you love most is soap-on-a-rope.”

Gray hair is God’s graffiti.”

There is hope for the future because God has a sense of humor and we are funny to God.”

Our Personal Brands are formed by our culture and those around us. Take a hard look inside and tell us what Personal Brand traits you have that can be traced back to a specific person or event? We’d love to hear who you are…

Keep Cooking!
Andrew

Photo Credit: Erinn Cosby


Jul 8 2008

Don’t Pick On The Kids!

Last week I read an article by Peter Madden in Advertising Age that, to me, carried criticism of the promotion for the 2008 Beijing Olympic games to an uncomfortable level. Although I agree that the “hype” for the games is a little vanilla, I simply have to remember what (and whom) they’re promoting – sport, athletes and honor. I think Mr. Madden lost sight of that.

Madden blasted the coverage, the commercials and the creative behind the campaign - from concept to print and on to the NBC broadcast coverage. And then, completely out of left field, he decided to cross a personal line and aim at the events and the participants themselves.

“I get it: 8.08.08. … Cue the Morgan Freeman voiceover as we watch cheesy slow-motion shots of athletes being awarded, competing, etc. with music that’s supposed to be dramatic. Oh, the humanity.”

Side note: That’s Visa’s commercials (see below).

“That doesn’t mean I’m not impressed with the athletic prowess of those involved in the Olympics, but really, swimming? Track and field? I think I’d rather watch curling.”

And then he took that step beyond.

“Imagine if the “Michael Jordan” of the Olympics you had to brand and market was Michael Phelps? Just the sound of his voice is enough to lull even my sleepless 2-and-a-half-month-old to the crib. I can only assume they did numerous takes of his voiceover for the spot they keep running on NBC. And that was the best they could get? He sounds like he’s still underwater.”

I was shocked, and it seems as though some of Mr. Madden’s other readers were too. As one reader commented, the Olympics are more about competition

“…built on Greek ideals of the nobility and honor of individual participation and representation of one’s country…”

We’re not promoting the Super Bowl. It’s not Air Jordan and the 20th NBA title for the Chicago Bulls. It’s not even NASCAR. It’s amateur athletes (kids) competing in the name of honor and sportsmanship. You can’t underwrite that with Budweiser and Doritos sponsorship.

So, Peter Madden hates Michael Phelps. Or at least he thinks he’s boring. Or maybe he just doesn’t like swimming. Or maybe he’s harboring some past angst from bullies picking on him for being the scrawny, sun burnt, redheaded kid at the swimming pool. Who knows? All I could tell is Mr. Madden seems to expect some kind of Madison Avenue generated super personality instead of a human being (Human? Have you seen Phelps in the water?!?).

So, let’s not pick on the kids for bad advertising. (Okay, so Dara Torres isn’t such a kid anymore.) Let’s not pick on the kids for carrying out a tradition of honor and sportsmanship that crosses all international boundaries, politics and policies.

Instead, let’s celebrate the idea that, for a few days in August, we get to watch a select few athletes compete in the sports that they love. Sports that define who they are and who they’ll be for the rest of their lives. Gold, silver, bronze or dead last – they’ve already won the ultimate prize. They get to play, if just for one event, with the rest of the world on a level field (swimming pool, track, or whatever) honorably and without prejudice. Maybe Mr. Madden could learn something from that?

Until next time, here’s some inspiration:
Visa Olympics
Bob Beamon
Derek Redmond
Kerri Strug

Keep Cooking!
Andrew


Jul 5 2008

Talk About Shock Awe!

In this season of patriotic fervor, I ran across this post that just seemed too cool for words.

Although I’m honored, I think there might be others more qualified… I think…

Happy 4th!

Keep Cooking!
Andrew